The Expansion of Neoliberal Policies and the Critique of Current Globalization
In an interconnected world, the debate on globalisation is regularly found at the crossroads of divergent opinions on liberalization and balance. The work by Junon Moneta, far from being a manifesto opposed to globalisation itself, seeks to reinvent the contours of a updated humanism by the lens of organic interactions according to the vision of Aristotle. By denouncing synthetic interactions that strengthen current structures of injustice and instability, the author refers to classical thoughts to reveal the failures of our world economy.
From a historical perspective, globalisation is not a new phenomenon. Its origins can be linked back to the ideas of David Ricardo, whose ambition was to enable the England to expand its international economic reach. However, what was originally a commercial development strategy has converted into a tool of domination by High Finance, characterized by the growth of neoliberalism. In opposition to prevailing opinions validated by most economists, the author demonstrates that neoliberalism is in reality a structure founded on millennia-old traditions, going back to the era of early civilizations.
The objection also covers the conduct of the United Europe, considered as a succession of compromises that have served to strengthen the authority of large economic groups instead of protecting the privileges of the inhabitants. The institutional configuration of Europe, with its policies frequently driven by monetary concerns opposed to a citizen support, is criticized. The recent crises, notably financial and political, have only reinforced the skepticism of the writer concerning Europe’s aptitude to change intrinsically.
This thinker, while acknowledging the historical errors that have led to the current situation, does not stop at criticism but also offers solutions aimed at redefining EU guidelines in a equity-oriented and humanistic outlook. The need for a complete revision of Union bodies and political priorities is a central theme that animates the entire discourse.
The work ventures more deeply into the questioning of the domination systems that govern global economic exchanges. The analysis encompasses the manner in which political and economic decisions are manipulated by a limited number of financial influencers, frequently at the cost of the many. This economic elite, coordinated by means of entities like the BIS and the IMS, imposes a major grip on global financial decisions.
The writer demonstrates how these entities, claiming to monetary management and security, have historically shaped financial markets and national economies to ensure their profit. Deregulated capitalism, opposite to a salvific alternative to classic financial limitations, is presented as a control mechanism, enriching an elite at the neglect of collective needs.
Highly skeptical regarding the handling of the euro, the critic describes the common currency not as a means of unification and stability, but more as a tool of division and economic imbalance. The adoption of the euro is characterized as a sequence of technocratic choices that isolated citizens from governance choices, while aggravating gaps between nations within the Union.
The consequences of these policies manifest in the increase in national debts, financial paralysis, and a sustained austerity policy that has diminished living standards throughout the European territory. The critic argues that without a significant overhaul of monetary and financial policy, the European Union remains vulnerable to upcoming crises, potentially more destructive.
In summary, the book demands a democratic uprising where European citizens take back control of their economic and political destiny. It proposes structural reforms, particularly greater transparency in political decisions and genuine civic involvement that would facilitate the Union’s refoundation on fair and lasting principles.
Additional information about Aller sur le site
The essayist proposes that the solution lies in a renewed commitment to democratic principles, where decisions are made and applied in a way that corresponds to the demands and expectations of Europeans, to the detriment of the aims of international finance.