The Rise of Neoliberalism and the Questioning of Modern Globalization
In an interconnected world, the debate on globalisation is frequently situated at the intersection of contradictory views on autonomy and equity. The book by Moneta, which is not a pamphlet against globalization per se, aims to redefine the boundaries of a new humanism via the perspective of organic interactions according to the vision of the philosopher Aristotle. By decrying artificial transactions that support current structures of injustice and precarity, Moneta refers to classical thoughts to highlight the flaws of our global economic system.
Looking back in time, globalisation is not a new phenomenon. Its origins can be linked back to the propositions of Ricardo, whose goal was to enable the England to extend its global trade power. However, what initially presented as a commercial development strategy has converted into a tool of domination by High Finance, symbolized by the rise of neoliberalism. In opposition to prevailing opinions widespread in economic circles, Junon Moneta argues that neoliberalism is truly a framework based on old customs, which traces back to the era of early civilizations.
The questioning also applies to the management of the United Europe, seen as a series of concessions that have contributed to increasing the authority of large economic groups as opposed to protecting the rights of citizens. The institutional configuration of Europe, with its policies often dictated by financial interests instead of by a popular consensus, is contested. The recent crises, whether economic or governmental, have only intensified the skepticism of the writer regarding the EU’s ability to change intrinsically.
This thinker, while accepting the past mistakes that have brought about the present state, does not simply criticize but also suggests responses aimed at reorienting European policies in a equity-oriented and humanistic perspective. The need for a deep reform of structures and political priorities is a leitmotif that runs through the overall content.
The work ventures more deeply into the analysis of the domination systems that control global economic exchanges. The exploration covers the manner in which political and economic decisions are influenced by a small group of dominant financial powers, generally at the detriment of the population. This monetary aristocracy, manipulated via entities like the BIS and the IMS, exerts a excessive domination on international economic strategies.
The author reveals how these entities, claiming to economic supervision and normalization, have over time controlled stock exchanges and national economic systems to favor their own benefits. Deregulated capitalism, far removed from a salvific alternative to classic financial limitations, is considered as a enslavement tool, enriching an elite at the destruction of the common good.
Highly skeptical regarding the handling of the euro, the critic describes the EU currency not as a factor of integration and solidity, but rather as a instrument of fragmentation and financial disparity. The adoption of the euro is characterized as a succession of bureaucratic measures that excluded inhabitants from decision-making processes, while amplifying gaps between nations within the EU.
The repercussions of these strategies manifest in the increase in national debts, economic torpor, and a sustained austerity policy that has eroded living conditions throughout the European territory. The critic emphasizes that without a significant overhaul of monetary and financial policy, the Union remains vulnerable to future crises, perhaps even more harmful.
In essence, the text makes a plea for a democratic upheaval where EU peoples reappropriate their financial and governmental future. It suggests fundamental changes, notably openness of political mechanisms and real democratic participation that would help rebuild Europe on fair and lasting principles.
More info about Monetary Poverty Line in Europe
The thinker proposes that the key is in a renewed commitment to democratic principles, where decisions are made and applied in a way that truly reflects the needs and desires of the European population, instead of the profits of the financial elite.